Teflon Tyronn: When Two All Stars Are Not Enough
By Leonard New
When Two All Stars Are Not Enough For the Cleveland Cavaliers
Unlike any other team sport, the NBA is star-driven. There is a direct correlation between star level players in the rotation and the success of the team. The difference between the “Haves” and the “Have Nots” of the NBA is heavily correlated to the number of star level players in their rotation.
More from King James Gospel
- Cavaliers’ Darius Garland should continue to improve in this area
- Top five Cleveland Cavaliers role players of all-time
- 3 possible starting lineups for Cleveland Cavaliers in 2023-24
- The Cavaliers may have snagged a hidden gem in Craig Porter Jr.
- 4 players the Cavaliers should pursue in 2024 free agency
Let’s define “star level” as a player who made the All Star game in any of the last three years and still is apart of the team’s normal rotation. One All Star or less is likely to be a lottery team. Two All Stars equate to a playoff team, but not a championship contender. Three All Stars or more and the team is a championship contender.
Using that metric and some quick analysis as of today there are five teams who have two star level players (Boston, Toronto, Chicago, San Antonio and with the recent trade New Orleans mid-season doesn’t count), one team with three star level players (Los Angeles Clippers) and two teams with four star level players (Golden State and Cleveland).
Note that the teams with two (except New Orleans) are all playoff teams with Boston, Toronto and San Antonio each have legitimate shots at their respective conference finals. With the success of teams harboring two star level players, doesn’t it seem strange that Coach Lue struggles when he is playing with only Love and Irving?